 |
 |
 |

|
|
Northrop Grumman Gets Quick Results
From Stereolithography
Aircraft maintenance and repair personnel have a tough job—for a number of reasons. First, they must ensure that every part on the aircraft they service
can withstand the rigors of flight, so that risks to the safety of the crew and any passengers that might be on board are minimized. They also must
minimize aircraft downtime while making sure that repair costs are controlled.
Northrop Grumman Corp., El Segundo, Calif., has mastered this balancing act,
largely due to the efforts of its Rapid Prototyping and Manufacturing (RP&M)
team. The team has shown a remarkable ability for creating the perfect modification
tool for the task at hand. It also discovered a surefire method for reducing to an absolute minimum both the time and cost associated with building
those tools.
The RP&M team uses “stereolithography”—commonly known as “SL” technology
—to create tools. 3D Systems Corp. (Valencia, Calif.) invented SL technology in the late-
1980s and continues to develop and supply systems for a wide range of applications.
Digital Manufacturing
Before stereolithography, companies relied on conventional prototyping methods, which require
cutting sample parts on regular production machines or by hand. These samples often need to
be created multiple times before a working prototype is produced.
With SL technology, the parts are created directly from a CAD file, which significantly increases
accuracy and speed, and decreases the need and time required for multiple iterations. As the SL
materials used to create rapid prototypes have improved, some companies have been able to
use the technology to create end-use parts. This ability is known as rapid manufacturing, a technique
that Northrop Grumman knows inside out.
“We are using SL to create tools that are used immediately to build or modify our products.”
Chris Farren, Northrop Grumman
“We have more than 700 SL-generated tools operating in our production and maintenance
facilities,” says Chris Farren, manager of technology applications for Northrop Grumman’s Air
Combat Systems. “I’m not talking about molds or prototypes. We are using stereolithography to
create tools that are used immediately to build or modify our products.”
Northrop Grumman uses an SLA 250 system from 3D Systems to produce parts as well as train
technicians on their use.
Orthoscopic Surgery for Aircraft
Of the 700-plus tools that Northrop Grumman has created using stereolithography, none is
more impressive than its aircraft repair kit. This kit, which is used to modify aircraft in the field, allows
Northrop Grumman technicians to use minimal manual labor in what traditionally would have
been major teardown-and-rebuild operations. “I liken it to orthoscopic surgery,” Farren says of
performing repairs with the kit. “We don’t have to disassemble nearly as much of the aircraft as
we typically would.”
The Northrop Grumman RP&M team initially developed the kit for a specific task, which it performed flawlessly the first time
out. That result can be attributed to the intense preparation on the part of the RP&M team, a process that also was enhanced
by 3D Systems’ SL technology.
The initial repair task was to reshape a component located in a hard-to-reach section of
an aircraft. Doing that without tearing down an entire section of the aircraft—and spending millions of dollars in the process—required a tool that would allow
a technician to reach inside the aircraft and reconfigure the component without having to see it.
A Flawless Procedure
The repair kit, which fits in a standard-size suitcase, consists of a set of tools for shaping
metal into a particular profile, along with a number of guides and gauges for ensuring that any cuts in the metal are set at the proper angle and depth. There
also is a port for cooling the metal during the shaping or cutting process and a second port for extracting debris.
Because the technician could not see inside the aircraft, he had to rely on the tool, which
employed its depth gauges and other guides, to first find the right location and then create the proper shape. “The operation worked flawlessly the first time,
on both the left and right sides of the aircraft,” he says. “This process was anywhere from 10 to 100 times less
expensive than conventional methods, primarily because we were able to build this tool,
test it and use it without having to go through an iterative development process.”
Farren says that the repair kit represents the ultimate step in Northrop Grumman’s use of SL technology. “We bought our
first SLA machine from 3D Systems roughly 10 years ago as a prototype development tool,” he explains. “We used it to
build wind-tunnel models and development projects, but it spent most of its life in the engineering
department.” About three years ago, Farren adds, the production department acquired
an SLA system, and the use of the technology has since spread across the Integrated
Systems/Air Combat Systems Business Area.
“We are proposing the use of SL technology for our next generation of aircraft,”
Farren says. “This is a reliable and cost-effective method for making the exact tool
that you need for a given job. We have shattered the notion that only metallic tools
are durable. With the current state of SL technology, including the plastic resins on
the market today, you can take tools directly out of an SLA machine and use them
in the field.”
For Northrop Grumman, rapid manufacturing is now a viable, beneficial reality.
|
|

|
|
|
|